Singular AI Art Generations

Recently, I have been playing around with Bing’s AI art generation.  In this new experiment, I wanted to see if the AI artist could replicate particular art periods as well as the styles of famous artists.  I was also curious to see what types of media the program could imitate, such as oil paint, ink etching, cut paper, and 4K photographs.  As I played around with various ideas and prompts, I noticed that there appear to be limitations (possibly put in place by Microsoft) with Bing’s AI art generator as adult themes like nudity and violence are not allowed.  There also seems to be an issue when attempting to reproduce the faces of celebrities; either the program struggles to create them (eventually settling on a vague facsimile) or the programmers have once again written restrictions into the algorithm to avoid this.  For example, I gave the AI artist the prompt: “Bill Gates shaking hands with Agent Smith from the Matrix.”  It was immediately blocked, and I was given a warning about attempting to break Bing’s AI art rules.  Additionally, there are the rare occasions where the AI will start to develop ideas for generations but will then glitch and fail.  Overall, I am still amazed by the AI’s ability to create original works of art while also replicating all of the particulars I mentioned earlier.

 

Below are some of my recent experimentations along with the prompts used to create them.  I have selected the best art generations from each prompt:

 

“Man running through a decaying art deco city at sunset, 4k, photograph.”

 

“Woman in toga praying in front of a gigantic statue of Aphrodite, intaglio, etching.”

 

 

“Portrait of a man tiger hybrid in a fancy suit and top hat, seaport background, 1800s painting.”

 

 

“Bicycle race, Bauhaus.”

 

 

“Waiter delivering food to customers in the style of Caravaggio, oil painting.”

 

 

“Asian chess masterpiece of a knight, made of ruby and gold, tilted, top detailed Maya render, style raw, ar 2:3.”

 

 

“Tropical beach with a close-up of a macaw, cut colored paper.”

 

Additional generations that didn’t make the final cut:

 

 

 

AI Art Experimentation

In my previous post, I discussed how humans, whether they are artists or laymen, are using Artificial Intelligence to create digital works of art.  Currently, there are several AI art generative tools that one can choose from, such as DALL-E 2, DreamStudio (Stable Diffusion), Midjourney, NightCafe, and Prodia, just to name a few.  Some of these programs are free to use, but many charge an annual fee (monthly or yearly).

 

Eager to try out this new technology and see how far it could be pushed, I chose to experiment with Bing Image Creator, which is a highly regulated version of DALL-E 2 (and is free to use with a Microsoft account).  The way this tool works is really quite simple; first you type in a word or sentence of an idea you have, then you click the “create” button.  The time it takes for the AI algorithm to formulate and generate the art of your idea depends on how specific your request is.

 

For my first generation request, I simply type in the word “dog”.  After a minute of waiting, the AI program generated four images of a dog that you see below. 

 

 

Initially, I was very excited that the resulting images actually looked like a dog.  However, my gradual thoughts were: “Why did the AI generate images of these particular dog breeds? Why did it choose to generate hyper-realistic images of dogs as opposed to say hand-drawn illustrations or 3D models?  Why are they all headshots and not full body views?”  I understand that users must be more precise with their words in order to get varied results, but I wonder why are these particular images (of dogs) the program’s defaults?  Interestingly, when I reverse image searched a few of these generations through Google I found a few websites were using very similar images of these dogs.  In fact, some images had the Bing AI art watermark in the lower left hand corner.

 

Next, I decided to repeat the same search, as I was curious to see if the AI would generate art of the same dog breed.  Once again, four images appeared; the color, lighting, and position of the dog’s head were all the same.  Perhaps the programmers (or those who built the original algorithm) chose a Retriever to be the AI’s default idea of a “dog”.

 

 

Eager to create something different, I decided to include the additional detail “with alien” in my original search.  In these new generations, I finally got four different breeds of dogs, different species of aliens, and varied head positions.  I was astonished by the uniqueness of each alien’s features (the number of eyes, the colors of their leathery skin), and I especially enjoyed the expressions on each of the dogs’ faces (some scared and others confused).

 

 

Subsequently, I decided to modify the sentence even further by adding the words “playing catch.”  It was at this point when I started to notice that the AI program seemed to be struggling with merging several figures into one image.  For example, you may notice that there are distortions around the eyes in some of the dogs’ faces.  I was intrigued by the fact that the program seems to interpret the request “Dog playing catch with alien” in multiple ways.  In two images, a dog and alien are playing catch with a ball (just as I requested), but in another image, it looks like the alien has taken on a football shape and is perhaps being caught by the dog (like a chew toy).  What I also found interesting was that in two images, the AI chose to include a UFO ship, even though I never requested that in the original prompt.

 

In the final step of my experiment with AI-generated art, I added a few more words to this ever-growing sentence: “Dog playing catch with alien at Fenway Park, photograph.”  By adding the word “photograph,” I hoped to make the final image appear more realistic, with no blurring and crystal-clear detail, rather than a digital illustration with painterly brushstrokes.  In the end, I am very happy with how three of the four art generations turned out.  In each image, the viewer can clearly see that there is a dog and an alien throwing a ball back and forth, that the location is a baseball stadium, and that the AI used the correct colors of Fenway Park.  The AI program really pushed itself to create dynamic movement in both the dog and alien bodies (specifically outstretched arms and bent knees).  One question I would have for the AI artist is, “Why are all of the dogs portrayed in profile view and not three-quarter view?”  I wonder if the program is capable of producing images where the dog has its back towards the camera.

 

 

 

If you would like to learn more about Bing AI click this link:

 

https://www.bing.com/images/create/help?FORM=GENHLP

 

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the concept of AI Art check out this article:

 

https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-art-artificial-intelligence-art

Thoughts on Artificial Intelligent-Generated Art

Within the past three years, there has been an explosion in the prevalence and popularity of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated art.  One only needs to simply type a descriptive sentence into an AI art generator, where a computer then rapidly formulates and generates multiple works of art (usually four variations of the same idea). 

 

It was back in the year 2020 when I first encountered the concept and some early examples of this brand of art.  These images, purported to be of portraits and landscapes, were simply blurs of color with few recognizable shapes and features.  The lack of realistic details was due to the primitive nature of the AI programs as well as the limited size and quality of available datasets (AI algorithms study and compile datasets/images from the web to create original works of art).

 

Fast-forward to today, AI art tools are now freely available to the public, where even a layman can generate beautiful yet comprehensible works of art.  Many of those blurring issues found in earlier image creations have been resolved, to where now any idea the artist can conceive, the AI algorithm can accurately generate.

 

Artificial intelligence isn’t just isolated to the field of art.  There are advanced chat AIs that can carry out full conversations with human users, generate coherent literature (poems, essays, short stories), and correct users’ spelling and grammar in prewritten papers.  Advancements in AI voice generation can produce voiceovers from basic sentence prompts while also giving users the option to choose the gender, ethnicity, and attitude of the AI voice (some can even replicate famous voices).

 

For many artists, including myself, there are serious concerns that this new technology will inevitably cause a decreased demand for art generated by humans and will eventually result in the elimination of creative jobs (such as human voiceover artists, graphic designers, etc.).  In some creative industries, like Hollywood, unions are attempting to halt AI advancement by implementing restrictions on AI usage in film.  Writers and actors see this as their only option to prevent the future abuse of their likenesses and protect themselves from the complete takeover of AI.  However, these efforts will do little to stop the progress of artificial intelligence (mainly because it is backed by corporate interests).

 

As an artist and future teacher, it is my responsibility to evolve and adapt to the times in which I live.  Technology and media will always change; if I want to be a knowledgeable and forward-thinking teacher, then I must be able to present new and evolving tools to my students.  As a matter of fact, there are some aspects of AI art generation that excite me.  Earlier, I mentioned that with AI anyone could generate works of art; I can imagine this being a boon to students with physical, cognitive, or emotional disabilities who might struggle with putting their creative ideas on paper.  Personally, I could use AI art as a brainstorming tool, generating multiple different thumbnails of an idea so that I am not wasting valuable time or expensive materials.  Additionally, with AI generative tools, I might finally be able to accomplish dream projects that I would never be able to on my own.

 

AI art, even with all of its advancements, is still in its infancy.  The art world and the general public are still grappling with the ethics and legality of AI generative tools.  There are equal amounts of fear and optimism regarding how this will affect human creativity (and jobs) in the future.  With all of this said, it is my gut feeling that artificially generated art is here to stay and will become even more popular.  As humans, we need to learn how to use this new and exciting tool to our advantage (just as we did with inventions like the printing press, cameras, computers and Photoshop).